Reperfusion – the good, the bad, and the ugly
نویسنده
چکیده
Reperfusion is mandatory to salvage ischemic myocardium from impending infarction. However, reperfusion also causes additional irreversible injury, not only to the myocardium, but also to the coronary microcirculation. Such reperfusion injury is the target of cardioprotective conditioning strategies. Such strategies include brief cycles of ischemia/reperfusion before (preconditioning), during (perconditioning), or after (postconditioning) the sustained myocardial index ischemia, either locally in the coronary circulation or remotely in limbs or other organs. Reperfusion injury is also the target of pharmacological cardioprotection therapies, eg, cyclosporine A, exenatide, or metoprolol, which engage parts of the signal transduction pathways involved in conditioning strategies. Acute myocardial stunning—fully reversible contractile dysfunction—during reperfusion after shorter episodes of myocardial ischemia is more paradigmatic than clinically relevant; however, long-term repetitive stunning initiates hibernation, ie, a state of prolonged contractile dysfunction, though with preserved viability such that contractile dysfunction is reversible upon eventual revascularization. Reperfusion arrhythmias are frequently observed, but are only rarely a clinical problem. L Heart Metab. 2016;70:4-7
منابع مشابه
Competition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?
The role of competition in healthcare is much debated. Despite a wealth of international experience in relation to competition, evidence is mixed and contested and the debate about the potential role for competition is often polarised. This paper considers briefly some of the reasons for this, focusing on what is meant by “competition in healthcare” and why it is more valuable to think about th...
متن کاملOptimisation of Healthcare Contracts: Tensions Between Standardisation and Innovation; Comment on “Competition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?”
An important determinant of health system performance is contracting. Providers often respond to financial incentives, despite the ethical underpinnings of medicine, and payers can craft contracts to influence performance. Yet contracting is highly imperfect in both single-payer and multi-payer health systems. Arguably, in a competitive, multi-payer environment, contractual innovation may occur...
متن کاملGood, bad and ugly: Exploring the Machiavellian power dynamics of leadership in medical education
Introduction: Medical education requires participation of variousstakeholders and this contributes to power dynamics operating atmultiple levels. Personality traits of an individual can affect thesmooth execution of the educational programmes and eventuallythe professionalism of the environment. With the increased focuson leadership traits in medical education and collaboration inhealth care se...
متن کاملThe Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Face Challenge Problem
The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly Face Challenge Problem was created to encourage the development of algorithms that are robust to recognition across changes that occur in still frontal faces. The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly consists of three partitions. The Good partition contains pairs of images that are considered easy to recognize. The base verification rate (VR) is 0.98 at a false accept rate (F...
متن کاملRadiation hormesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Three aspects of hormesis with low doses of ionizing radiation are presented: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is acceptance by France, Japan, and China of the thousands of studies showing stimulation and/or benefit, with no harm, from low dose irradiation. This includes thousands of people who live in good health with high background radiation. The bad is the nonacceptance of radiatio...
متن کاملRange Extension for Weak PRFs; The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
We investigate a general class of (black-box) constructions for range extension of weak pseudorandom functions: a construction based on m independent functions F1, . . . , Fm is given by a set of strings over {1, . . . , m}, where for example {〈2〉, 〈1, 2〉} corresponds to the function X 7→ [F2(X), F2(F1(X))]. All efficient constructions for range expansion of weak pseudorandom functions that we ...
متن کامل